Like many others, I was thankful for Jen Wilkin's recent post over at TGC entitled "Failure Is Not a Virtue." She expresses appropriate concern over what she calls "celebratory failurism" - the tendency to excuse our sins by casting them as means by which we experience more grace. Tullian Tchividjian fired back with a strongly worded response accusing Wilkin of muddy theology and confusing theological categories. Dr. Michael Kruger responded with understandable dismay given the fact that Pastor Tchividjian never actually responds to Wilkin's article and even accuses her of assertions she did not make. To Dr. Kruger's response (are you following this?) Pastor Tchividjian did not yield the point but dug in by asserting that he knows of no one guilty of "celebratory failurism." I actually have seen quite a bit of it. Jared Oliphint effectively pushes back on Pastor Tchividjian's objection. But I digress. Continue at Todd Pruitt
Scriptures teach consistently that faith comes through the proclamation of the gospel, not through good works. Christ himself was not arrested and arraigned because he was trying to restore family values or feed the poor...The mounting ire of the religious leaders toward Jesus coalesced around him making himself equal with God and forgiving sins in his own person, directly, over against the temple and its sacrificial system. Michael Horton
The purpose of this Blog is to introduce men and women all over the World to the Doctrines of Grace; the 5 Solas; Reformation Theology and the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Showing posts with label Indicatives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indicatives. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Imperatives are for Preaching...
Like many others, I was thankful for Jen Wilkin's recent post over at TGC entitled "Failure Is Not a Virtue." She expresses appropriate concern over what she calls "celebratory failurism" - the tendency to excuse our sins by casting them as means by which we experience more grace. Tullian Tchividjian fired back with a strongly worded response accusing Wilkin of muddy theology and confusing theological categories. Dr. Michael Kruger responded with understandable dismay given the fact that Pastor Tchividjian never actually responds to Wilkin's article and even accuses her of assertions she did not make. To Dr. Kruger's response (are you following this?) Pastor Tchividjian did not yield the point but dug in by asserting that he knows of no one guilty of "celebratory failurism." I actually have seen quite a bit of it. Jared Oliphint effectively pushes back on Pastor Tchividjian's objection. But I digress. Continue at Todd Pruitt
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Galatians, Gospel Indicatives, and Gospel Imperatives
At last week’s 9Marks @Southeastern conference,
our conference host and seminary president Dr. Danny Akin delivered an
overview sermon on the entire book of Galatians. Get this: the sermon
had two major divisions with 42 subpoints! Don’t try this at home kids!
Essentially, Akin walked us through the book of Galatians commenting
on the 29 indicative statements Paul makes about the gospel and the 13
imperatives that flow from them. If you’ve been following the blog
discussion of the relationship between indicatives and imperatives then
you might be interested in this talk and the panel that followed. Akin
makes it plain that out of the “done” (indicatives) there flows a “do”
(imperatives).
For those that are curious, here are the 29 gospel indicatives and 13 gospel imperatives Akin highlighted:
29 Indicatives
1. The gospel is rooted in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Gal. 1:1).
2. The gospel delivers us from the present evil age to the glory of Christ (1:3-5).
3. There is only one gospel and to desert it is to be damned (1:6-9).
4. The gospel is ours by divine revelation and not human imagination (1:10-12).
5. The gospel is grounded in a gracious election (1:15).
6. The gospel is constantly in danger of being lost and needs to be defended (2:4-5).
7. The gospel that saves Gentiles is the same gospel that saves Jews (2:7-9).
8. There are ethical imperatives that follow the gospel (2:11) and no ethnic distinctions in the gospel (2:12-14).
9. The gospel is good news that we are justified by faith in Jesus Christ and not by works of the Law (2:15-16).
10. Through the gospel, we are identified with Christ and His work on the cross (2:20). Read the all HERE
Monday, September 12, 2011
"Don't Give me Doctrine, I Just Want to Follow Jesus"
When someone says, "Don't give me doctrine, I just want to follow
Jesus", what they are really saying is "give me law, not gospel. Give me
more imperatives and less indicatives. I just want something
practical." But how is this any different than Mormons or theological
liberals? Fact is, we need a Savior, not just a moral example.
You could not have believed the gospel of Jesus Christ without
knowing its contents. You did not just follow a generic Jesus. To be
saved you understood that you had no self righteousness of your own and
you trusted in Christ's finished work... which included His living the
life you should have lived and dying the death you deserved. This is
doctrine. The idea of simply "following Jesus" is requiring more demands
of the law because you are looking for Jesus to tell you something you
can do. But you need the gospel, not merely law, to be saved or to grow
in grace. Indeed following Jesus springs out of a renewed heart. As
Christians we only follow Jesus when we know Who we are following and as
such we need to preach the gospel to ourselves daily.
The Spirit first first brings an elect soul face to face with God’s holy Law, for “by the law is the knowledge of sin” (Rom. 3:20).
It condemns and curses him because it demands perfect obedience in
thought, word, and deed. Next, the Spirit brings before the soul the
precious Gospel where the law's demands are perfectly met by Jesus
Christ. The Spirit so works in his heart that He appears to him to be
the most glorious object in the world; and so rests entirely upon His
finished work. Keep Reading...
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Indicatives and imperatives
Justin Taylor
has provided a helpful set of links to the ongoing discussions between
William Evans and Sean Lucas at Reformation21 and Kevin DeYoung and
Tullian Tchividjian at the Gospel Coalition. Having made reference to a
couple of these before, being persuaded of how important the issues are,
and therefore having an ongoing interest in the matter, I thought
others might appreciate following the discussion. Taylor summarises:
William B. Evans and Sean Michael Lucas have been engaged in a profitable discussion over at Reformation 21 on sanctification and the gospel. Here are their exchanges:
- Evans, Sanctification and the Nature of the Gospel
- Lucas, A Rejoinder on Sanctification and the Gospel
- Evans, Sanctification and the Gospel: A Surrejoinder to Sean Lucas
- Lucas, A Concluding Contribution on Sanctification and the Gospel
- Evans, A Question of Balance? Some Final Comments on Sanctification and the Role of the Law
Rick Phillips also added a helpful and important post summarizing seven assertions about the relationship between justification and sanctification.
As I’ve mentioned before, Kevin DeYoung and Tullian Tchividjian have been engaged in a longer—though less direct—discussion addressing similar issues:
- DeYoung, Make Every Effort
- Tchividjian, Work Hard! But in Which Direction?
- DeYoung, Gospel-Driven Effort
- Tchividjian, First Things First
- DeYoung, Glorying in Indicatives and Insisting on Imperatives
- Tchividjian, Deconstructing Moralism
The Wanderer
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
