This is the final part of the analysis of the 19th century theological invention known as dispensationalism. Following are the final 15 theses from the NiceneCouncil.com’s concise
but thorough examination of the critical errors with the theological
system known as dispensationalism.
Dispensationalism is, like most other
systems, not comprised of a monolithic group who all believe alike. So
please bear in mind this series in not an attack on any person, but an
examination of a system. I pray to God that this series has been
received as an effort in being honest and humbler Bereans, examining a
system beloved by many, but resting on the imaginations of men.
81. Despite the dispensationalists’ attempt to re-interpret Ezekiel’s
prophecies of a future sacrificial system by declaring that they are
only “memorial” in character, and are therefore like the Lord’s Supper,
the prophecies of that temple which they see as being physically
“rebuilt” speak of sacrifices that effect “atonement” (Ezek. 43:20;
45:15, 17, 20); whereas the Lord’s Supper is a non-bloody memorial that
recognizes Christ as the final blood-letting sacrifice. Continue at Manfred
