If you put together all the maladies of those whom Jesus miraculously healed during His earthly ministry (i.e. those
having to do with eyes, ears, tongues, arms, hands, legs, skin and
blood) you would have a perfectly deformed man or woman–both internally
and externally. Isaiah used the figure of a person entirely deformed
from head to toe to describe our spiritual condition of depravity by
nature (Isaiah 1: 5-6). The apostle Paul likened our spiritual condition
by nature to that of a physically dead man (Ephesians 2:1-5). This
should come as no surprise to us if we understand that the healing
miracles–historical though they were–are really spiritual parables for
us. They are parables that carry our minds back to Eden and the awful
effects of Adam’s sin; and, they are parables that carry our minds
forward to see the glory of Jesus, the second Adam, and the King of
God’s Kingdom who came to heal the souls and bodies of His people. This
is most fully symbolized in the resurrection miracles of Jesus in the
Gospels. Here are five observations, drawn from Herman Ridderbos’
outstanding book The Coming of the Kingdom, about what the healing miracles of Jesus teach us: Continue at Nicholas T. Batzig
Scriptures teach consistently that faith comes through the proclamation of the gospel, not through good works. Christ himself was not arrested and arraigned because he was trying to restore family values or feed the poor...The mounting ire of the religious leaders toward Jesus coalesced around him making himself equal with God and forgiving sins in his own person, directly, over against the temple and its sacrificial system. Michael Horton
The purpose of this Blog is to introduce men and women all over the World to the Doctrines of Grace; the 5 Solas; Reformation Theology and the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Showing posts with label Messiah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Messiah. Show all posts
Friday, October 11, 2013
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The Prototype Believer
Most of us remember long boring road-trips during our childhood.
Before the day of portable DVD players, iPods, and Nintendo 3DS’s there
wasn’t much to do apart from read or count cars.
Not being much of a reader then, car-counting was my thing. One of
the games my twin brother and I used to play was to see who could spot
the most models of our own car on the road. It always amazed me how many
there were when you started looking.
But there was a time when there was only one. Before the assembly
line started rolling out thousands of Ford Cortinas, there was one, the
prototype that all the others were modeled upon.
That’s how Abraham is set before us in the Bible; he’s a prototype of
all other believers. Although there were believers before Abraham (e.g.
Abel, Enoch, Noah, etc.), God presents him as the prototype believer,
the one that all subsequent believers are to model themselves on (Rom.
4; Gal. 3).
So, what was exemplary about Abraham’s faith? I’d like to highlight two key features from the last few verses of Romans 4:
His faith diminished obstacles and difficulties.
God had promised Abraham that he would be the father of many nations. Aged 99, he was still not a father. Indeed, Romans 4 tells us that the child-producing part of his body was already dead, as was his 91-year-old wife’s womb. These were huge obstacles in the way of fulfilling this promise.
God had promised Abraham that he would be the father of many nations. Aged 99, he was still not a father. Indeed, Romans 4 tells us that the child-producing part of his body was already dead, as was his 91-year-old wife’s womb. These were huge obstacles in the way of fulfilling this promise.
But Abraham “did not consider” this double deadness (Rom. 4:19). That
does not mean that he ignored the difficulties or that he denied
reality. That’s not faith; that’s stupidity. Rather, “did not consider,”
means that although he saw and understood the difficulties very
clearly, he did not let what he saw and understood determine what he
believed. Continue at David P. Murray
Friday, February 10, 2012
A Suffering Servant and Type of Christ
“And the LORD was with Joseph…” —Genesis 39:2
“He is
despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with
grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we
esteemed him not.” —Isaiah 53:3
One of the
more well-known titles for the Lord Jesus Christ is “Messiah, Son of
David.” Certainly, Jesus is the King of Israel in fulfillment of that
prophecy. Yet, the Jews also had another name for God’s Christ:
“Messiah, Son of Joseph,” a reference to the suffering servant of
Genesis 37 and Isaiah 53. Joseph, the son of Jacob was, indeed, a
suffering servant of God Almighty; however, his life was a prophetic
foreshadow of the Christ to come.
a. Joseph lost his mother during the birth of his younger brother (Gen 35:18-19).
b. Jacob’s special favor upon Joseph (Gen 37:3) only made Joseph’s brothers hate him all the more (Gen 37:4).
c. Joseph’s brothers conspired to kill him (Gen 37:18).
d. Joseph was sold into bondage by his brothers (Gen 37:28).
e. In the house of Potiphar, Joseph was constantly tempted by a seductress (Gen 39:7).
f. Joseph was imprisoned through lies (Gen 39:12-20).
g. Joseph received only empty promises from those he helped (Gen 40:14,
23). Continue at Jon J. Cardwell
See Also: Nine Good Purposes in Our Suffering
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Christ the Desire of All Nations by John Flavel (1628-1691)
“And the desire of all nations shall come.” Haggai 2:7.
The first chapter of Haggai is mainly spent in reproving the
negligence of the Jews, who, being discouraged from time to time, had
delayed the rebuilding of the temple. In the meantime they employed
their care and cost in building and adorning their own houses: but, at
last, being persuaded to set about the work, they met with this
discouragement, that such was the poverty of the present time, that the
second structure would not match the magnificence and splendor of the
first. In Solomon’s days the nation was wealthy, but now it was drained;
so that there would be no comparison between the second and the first.
To this great discouragement the prophet applies this relief: that
whatsoever should be lacking in external pomp and glory, should be more
than recompensed by the presence of Jesus Christ in this second temple.
For Christ, “the desire of all nations,” he says, shall come into it.
Which, by the way, may give us this useful note: The presence of Jesus
Christ gives a more real and excellent glory to the places of his
worship, than any external beauty or outward ornaments whatsoever can
bestow upon them. Our eyes, like the disciples, are apt to be dazzled
with the sparkling stones of the temple, and, in the meantime, to
neglect and overlook that which gives it the greatest honour and beauty.
But to return. In these words we have
both the description of Christ, and an arrow pointing at the time of his
incarnation: he is called “the desire of all nations,” and the time of
his coming in the flesh is clearly implied to be during the time of the
second temple. Where, by the way, we find a valid reason to stand amazed
at and bemoan the blindness of the Jews. They admit the truth of this
prophecy and are not able to deny the destruction of the second temple,
many hundred years past, yet will not be brought to acknowledge the
incarnation of the true Messiah. Keep Reading >>>
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Grace for Recovering Pharisees
Pastor Bruce Brock of Faith Community Church in Tucson, Arizona, is a
dear friend of mine. God has used him greatly in my own life, and over
the last decade or so, we have taken something of the same spiritual and
theological journey in discovering and embracing the doctrines of grace
together.
Galatians is one of the earliest of Paul’s letters and an early
defense of salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ
alone. It precedes the Jerusalem Council where the early church
leadership all got on the same page concerning salvation by God’s free
grace – Acts 15:4-11. The churches in Galatia (Lystra, Derbe, etc) were from Paul’s first missionary journey – Acts 14.
The false teachers were Jewish (Judaizers) and wanted to add
circumcision, feasts, dietary laws, ceremonial laws to faith in Christ;
they would add the Mosaic Law to the Gospel. Their logic was that Jesus
is Messiah and He came in fulfillment of the Scriptures (OT), so it is
reasonable to stay with what God gave us so long ago and simply add it
to Christ. Keep Reading>>>
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Bible Prophecy Fulfilled in Stunning, Dramatic Detail
In light of the Harold Camping debacle (I fully endorse Dr. James White’s open letter to Camping found here), at a time when many in the world are scoffing at the truth claims of the Bible, how good it is to remind ourselves that God’s word stands alone as the ultimate source of revelation for the future.
We should always remember that around 80% of the Bible’s predictions have already been fulfilled. That does not mean that the Bible is only 80% accurate. Far from it in fact. I venture to say that the Bible is 100% accurate and will be proven to be so as time transpires. The remaining 20% of Bible prophecy are yet to be realised, simply because they relate to events immediately before, during and after the second coming of Messiah.
As Christians, we believe our Savior’s name is the Lord Jesus Christ. Its important to understand that “Christ” is not Jesus’ last name, but rather a title. The word “Christ” comes from the Greek word “Christos” which is the Greek translation of the Hebrew word for Messiah. When we say, “Jesus Christ” we are literally saying, “Jesus the Christ” or “Jesus the Messiah.” But are these claims valid? Can we be sure that Jesus is the long awaited Messiah?
Through what we call Messianic Prophecies, God provided a sure and certain way to recognize His Messiah when He came. These are events written in the Bible, hundreds and even thousands of years before they would take place in time. Only God could reveal such amazing detail millennia in advance of the events. Keep Reading...
Monday, January 3, 2011
The Glory of Israel Revealed
I am utterly convinced that the glory of Israel can be found in no other place than in Christ. He is the only true and rightful heir of the promise of God made to Abraham for “Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ.” [Gal 3:16] The promise of God was reserved for Christ alone by God’s own will in the giving of the Law, which was “added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made.” [Gal 3:19]. All this so that the promises of God could only be inherited by those who have faith in His Son. [Gal 3:22] Through many tears the apostle Paul spoke of this truth to the church in Rome, and though he had great affection for his own Jewish people, it was his words penned under the inspiration of the Spirit of God that said “This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” [Romans 9:8] Read it all HERE
Monday, December 6, 2010
The Continuity of Theological Concepts: A New Covenant Reading of Old Covenant Texts
While studying and teaching Zechariah 9-14 near Beirut, Lebanon I was challenged to think about the meaning and relevance of those chapters to Lebanese believers who often suffer because of the animosity between Lebanon and the very nation and people who are mentioned in those chapters. Does an alleged promised restoration of Israel and Jerusalem bring comfort or chagrin to believers in Lebanon? After all, are not Arabic speaking believers and Jewish believers in the Middle East the true people of God? Are they not the ones who should expect to share in the triumph of God? Does present day Israel have a “favored nation” status that trumps the “holy nation” of the church (1 Pet 2:9-10)?
Furthermore, does not a similar conundrum exist for those of us who live in North America? Do these texts have anything relevant to say to a largely Gentile church? Do we simply rejoice because ethnic Israel is to be restored or do we rejoice because the triumph which the old covenant nation expected is the triumph that belongs to all of those who are children of God through faith in Jesus Christ? Admittedly, the question of relevancy should not be determinative in the understanding of biblical texts but it does raise questions that might not be raised otherwise. Continue Reading>>>
Furthermore, does not a similar conundrum exist for those of us who live in North America? Do these texts have anything relevant to say to a largely Gentile church? Do we simply rejoice because ethnic Israel is to be restored or do we rejoice because the triumph which the old covenant nation expected is the triumph that belongs to all of those who are children of God through faith in Jesus Christ? Admittedly, the question of relevancy should not be determinative in the understanding of biblical texts but it does raise questions that might not be raised otherwise. Continue Reading>>>
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
The Threat of Christian Zionism
If the phenomenal success of the bestselling Left Behind series indicates anything about the prevailing eschatological mindset across a wide swath of the evangelical landscape in modern America, then we would do well to pause and consider. Where is this fascination with the sensational, and frequently outright bizarre, interpretation of the significance of current events coming from? What is driving the obsession to see end-time prophetic events transpiring in every headline? What connection does this mindset have with the implacable opposition to any measure taken for peace in the Middle East which would leave the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, the West Bank, or any part of Jerusalem outside of the complete control of the modern state of Israel? More importantly, what ideologies, theological convictions, or ways of understanding the bible lie beneath these phenomena, and how much of an impact are they having on the theological moorings of the Church today? I suspect that the impact is significant enough to warrant a strong warning statement about the movement known as Christian Zionism, and the hyper-Dispensationalism which drives it, from the leaders of the evangelical Church. Unfortunately, however, it has not received the united front of resistance with which other threats to the health of the Church have been met with, such as Openness theology and gender-role confusion. Is this because many Evangelical leaders share enough theological convictions in common with the more extreme examples of the movement that they are loathe to give a clear denunciation? Or do they simply not perceive the errors as being a significant or widespread enough a danger to warrant the time and effort of a thoroughgoing rebuttal? Whatever the reason, there seems to be a general lack of attentiveness to a very rampant problem in Evangelicalism. Perhaps it is time to make clear just what Christian Zionism is (as well as all its theological bedfellows), what convictions are driving it, and what results it is tending towards in the thoughts and practice of the contemporary believer. Continue Reading>>>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)