Several years ago I was walking in a park and met a man who
identified himself as a pantheist. As I shared the Gospel with him, he
raised a series of objections, the first of which concerned the
reliability of Scripture. “The Bible was going along fine,” he
explained, “until King James came along and changed it all. Now we have
no idea what the original Bible actually said.”
The man’s objection was obviously more than a bit misinformed, but it does raise a significant question: If we do not possess the original manuscripts of the Bible, if the existing manuscripts do not completely agree with each other, and if there is no absolutely sure method of determining the original reading where these differences exist, then how can we have confidence in the Bible we possess today?
The points of difference between existing
manuscripts are known as textual variants, and the process of
determining the original wording where variants exist is known as
textual criticism. Because this process is at least partly subjective in
nature, it is not infallible and therefore we cannot know with absolute
certainty what the original manuscripts said in a given place. For this
reason, the question is indeed a significant one: Can we really trust
the Bible as it has been handed down to us? Keep Reading...
No comments:
Post a Comment