I. Introduction
The doctrine of the Trinity
requires a balanced view of Scripture. That is, since the
doctrine itself is derived from more than one stream of evidence,
it requires that all the evidence be weighed and given authority.
If any of the foundational pillars of the doctrine (monotheism,
the deity of Christ, the person of the Holy Spirit, etc.) be
ignored or even rejected, the resulting doctrinal system will
differ markedly from the orthodox position, and will lose its
claim to be called "biblical." For centuries various
small groups have rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. In modern
times these groups have frequently attracted quite a following;
Jehovah's Witnesses as the modern heirs of Arius have over 3
million people actively engaged in their work; the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormons) are heirs of
ancient polytheism and mystery religions, and nearly 10 million
adhere to their teachings. A smaller number of people, however,
cling to the third-century position of modalism - the teachings
of men such as Sabellius or Praxeas or Noetus. Though fewer in
number, it is this position, popularly called the
"Oneness" teaching, that prompts this paper's
clarification of the Biblical position regarding the doctrine of
the Trinity and the Person of Jesus Christ. Oneness writers
strongly deny the doctrine of the Trinity. In the words of David
K. Bernard,
"The Bible does not teach the
doctrine of the trinity, and trinitarianism actually contradicts
the Bible. It does not add any positive benefit to the Christian
message....the doctrine of the trinity does detract from the
important biblical themes of the oneness of God and the absolute
deity of Jesus Christ." Continue at James White
