Mark Steyn hit the nail on the head when he accused a Canadian
appeals court of allowing for a “fourth-trimester abortion” — that’s
right, the killing of a baby that is already born.
The case emerged from the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta, where a
judge faced the fact that a woman had been convicted of strangling her
newborn son and then throwing the baby’s body over the fence into her
neighbor’s yard.
A CBC News reported, the woman was given a three-year suspended
sentence and will spend no time in jail for the killing of her baby.
Katrina Efferts “will have to abide by conditions for the next three
years but she won’t spend time behind bars for strangling her own son.”
JudgJustice Joanne Veit, whose name should now go down in legal and moral
infamy, tied this woman’s act of infanticide to Canada’s lack of legal
restrictions on abortion. The judge’s decision stated that “while many
Canadians undoubtedly view abortion as a less than ideal solution to
unprotected sex and unwanted pregnancy, they generally understand,
accept and sympathize with the onerous demands pregnancy and childbirth
exact from mothers, especially mothers without support.” Keep Reading...
No comments:
Post a Comment