As it turns out, President Bush did not merely attend the wedding. He
also served as an official witness, signing the legal documents for the
ceremony and the Maine wedding license. Under a photograph with the
former president the couple added the words, “Getting our marriage
license witnessed!” Continue at Al Mohler
Scriptures teach consistently that faith comes through the proclamation of the gospel, not through good works. Christ himself was not arrested and arraigned because he was trying to restore family values or feed the poor...The mounting ire of the religious leaders toward Jesus coalesced around him making himself equal with God and forgiving sins in his own person, directly, over against the temple and its sacrificial system. Michael Horton
The purpose of this Blog is to introduce men and women all over the World to the Doctrines of Grace; the 5 Solas; Reformation Theology and the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Showing posts with label Presidents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Presidents. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
George and Barbara Witness a Wedding—When a Private Act Sends a Public Message
Thursday, May 10, 2012
How to Win the Public on Homosexuality
President Obama's support for same-sex marriage is making headlines but not news. That's probably because he was in favor of same-sex marriage
before he was against it and now in favor of it again. Campaigning in
1996 for state senate in Illinois, Obama said in a typed statement, "I
favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit
such marriages." Running for statewide and then national office
apparently changed his perspective, at least temporarily.
But there's another reason much of the country has shrugged off
no-news headlines about the culmination of President Obama's
"evolution": 50 percent of Americans now agree with him.
In the last 16 years, support for same-sex marriage has nearly doubled.
Gallup shows an increase in support from just 27 percent in 1996 to a
high of 53 percent in 2011 and now 50 percent in 2012. Since 1996,
Christians have debated homosexuality almost non-stop, and several
Protestant denominations have reached the same conclusion as Obama. He told ABC's Robin Roberts today:
In the end the values that I care most deeply about, and [Michelle Obama] cares most deeply about, is how we treat other people and, you know, I, you know, we are both practicing Christians, and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it's also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated. Continue at Collin Hansen
SEE ALSO:
The President and Gay Marriage: The Truth at Last
President Obama’s Scriptural Defense of Gay Marriage
Saturday, February 25, 2012
What is a Christian?
Franklin Graham, Jr. scandalized the talking heads on “Morning Joe”
earlier this week when he appeared on the program and suggested that
President Obama might not be a “Christian” (see video below). I
appreciate Rev. Graham and his bold commitment to Christ, but I think
there was much in what he said that was muddled and inconsistent and
that probably did very little to win folks over to his position. I for
one wish that the conversation had gone differently.
Having said that, one item that needed to be clarified was exactly
what is meant by the term “Christian.” It was very clear that Graham and
his interlocutors were operating on two totally different views of what
it means to be a Christian. For Graham, being Christian is synonymous
with being born again and with all that the new birth entails. For the
“Morning Joe” crew, being a Christian is simply about being personally
affiliated with a church or a group that professes to be Christian. The
former is a normative definition while the latter is a sociological one. Which definition is right? The normative or the sociological?
In terms of common usage, the term “Christian” can have both
meanings. When someone says that Prince Charles is a Christian prince,
they are using the sociological sense. They are not trying to say that
he has been born again and professes the true faith. On the contrary,
everyone knows that quite the opposite is true. Charles’ Christian
affiliation is one that he was born into. It is a historical connection
more than a personal conviction. There are many people who would claim
to be “Christian” in this sociological sense. Continue at Denny Burk
Friday, October 14, 2011
Mormonism 101
Mormonism is back in the news. And with two Mormon presidential
candidates, including Mitt Romney (the front runner for the Republican
nomination), there’s a good chance we will be hearing much more about
Mormonism for the next twelve months. Denny Burk has a very helpful
piece on whether Mormonism is a cult, and Albert Mohler has written a thoughtful article on “Mormonism, Democracy, and the Urgent Need for Evangelical Thinking.”
I won’t repeat their arguments, except to reiterate Mohler’s reminder
that voting for a president should include examining the candidate’s
religious beliefs, but should include other considerations as well.
Presidential elections are important. But believing the truth is even
more important. With that in mind, I thought it might be helpful to
provide a brief overview of Mormon history and theology. I won’t try to
debunk Mormonism or prove Christianity. But I hope this quick survey
will show that the two are not the same.
A quick note on secondary sources: Christian materials do not always
treat Mormonism fairly or go the extra mile to present Mormon ideas as a
Mormon would recognize it. One book that does is Andrew Jackson’s Mormonism Explained: What Latter-day Saints Teach and Practice. I also recommend A Different Jesus? The Christ of the Latter-Day Saints by
BYU professor Robert Millet. Richard Mouw concedes too much in his
Foreword and Afterword, but it’s still helpful to get Mormon Christology
from a Mormon himself. Keep Reading>>>
Monday, August 15, 2011
A Wall of Separation Between Church and State
Where does the phrase “a wall of separation between Church and State” come from?
The Constitution?
The Declaration of Independence?
Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists?
The First Amendment?
The Articles of Confederation?
Did you guess correctly?
The phrase “a wall of separation between Church and State” comes from
the pen of President Thomas Jefferson when he wrote to a group of
Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut. They were concerned about the
possible establishment of a church that they would be required to
attend.
Jefferson wrote to ensure them that their free practice of religious
liberty would never be interfered with by the government, for that would
go against the will of the people and the Constitution. Jefferson
closed his letter by thanking them for their prayers on his behalf. Keep Reading...
Friday, July 24, 2009
Sorry, President Carter . . . This Argument Falls Flat
He may well be the world's most famous Sunday School teacher, but over just the last several years he has publicly expressed his rejection of the belief that persons must come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ in order to be saved. He has also stated that his faith would not be shaken if Jesus did not perform some of the miracles attributed to him in the New Testament. His denial of biblical inerrancy is not merely theoretical -- he actually operates on the assumption that at least some texts of the Bible are false, untruthful, malignantly oppressive, and thus untrustworthy.President Carter actually makes no argument for women as pastors. He simply dismisses out of hand what the Christian church has believed for centuries -- and what the vast majority of Christians around the world believe even now. His argument should embarrass any serious person who considers this question, for it is grounded in little more than his own sense of how things ought to be. He makes claims about the Bible that are reckless and irresponsible and historical claims that would make any credible church historian blush. He straightforwardly rejects what he admits some texts of the Bible teach. Read the rest HERE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)