With Reformation Day looming, it behooves us to ask WWLD today? If
Luther were alive right now, would he still be agitated enough to post
95 Thesis on a blog? I’ve encountered a sentiment among modern
Protestants that of course the Reformation was necessary, since the
Catholic Church of Martin Luther’s day has degenerated into a false
religion. But today Catholics don’t believe all those erstwhile wacky
“coin in the coffer” things that Tetsel was on about.
From October 1962 until December 1965, the Second Vatican Council was
held to address the Catholic Church’s relationship to the Modern world
(read: update God’s revelation to deal with the Pill, etc.) The
authority of the documents published by this council—known in Catholic
shorthand as “Vatican II”—are considered to be on par with Scripture.
This would have been an ideal time to rectify some of the issues Luther
had with his mother church. To help you decide if Protestantism is
pertinacious or passé, I offer a few passages from the horse’s own vocal
chords for your consideration.
Exhibit A: The section titled, “Apostolic Constitutions on the Revision
of Indulgences” was dated 1 January 1967. This would be the most
opportune place to denounce the crass practice of indulgences (manmade
ways of expiating sin) which was addressed by Luther’s first thesis.
Instead Pope Paul VI subtitles the first chapter “Indulgence are Founded
in Divine Revelation” and writes, “If we wish to understand exactly
the doctrine of indulgences and its benefits in practice, we must
remember truths which the whole Church, enlightened by God’s word, has
always believed. These truths have been taught by the bishops, who are
the successors of the apostles…throughout the centuries to this day.”
(Sect 6, chapt 1, para 1). Keep Reading...
No comments:
Post a Comment