At some level, every Calvinist who is not hyper embraces a paradox (you can call it tension, antinomy, aporia,
really deep mystery, or whatever you like, but I prefer "paradox").
This is properly true of every Christian, but it is especially true of
Biblical Calvinists. Our theology generates paradox, whether it's the apparent duality of divine wills, multiple senses of God's love and hatred for fallen humanity, or the compatibility of
deterministic divine sovereignty and real human
choice/freedom/responsibility. Calvinism without the essential balance
of Biblically-derived paradox is in danger of going the way of Herman
Hoeksema and the PRC. Characteristically, hyper-Calvinists eschew
paradoxes in every possible way. Arminians, for their part, also seem
reluctant to embrace paradoxes. Some take great delight in calling
Calvinistic paradoxes "contradictions," ignoring the fact that these are
unavoidable if we take divine revelation and historic/orthodox
Christianity at face value.
THEOparadox is essentially a call for Calvinists (and others) to do two things:
1. Go whole hog and embrace every Biblically justified paradox, refusing to exegetically "adjust" any verse or passage of Scripture that might create a seeming contradiction in Systematic Theology.
2. Be rigorous in trying to understand, explain and evaluate possible resolutions to these paradoxes, but accept the fact that we can ultimately have no greater certainty than the very words of Scripture afford us. Keep Reading...
THEOparadox is essentially a call for Calvinists (and others) to do two things:
1. Go whole hog and embrace every Biblically justified paradox, refusing to exegetically "adjust" any verse or passage of Scripture that might create a seeming contradiction in Systematic Theology.
2. Be rigorous in trying to understand, explain and evaluate possible resolutions to these paradoxes, but accept the fact that we can ultimately have no greater certainty than the very words of Scripture afford us. Keep Reading...
No comments:
Post a Comment