In a fair bit of Western evangelicalism, there is a worrying tendency
to focus on the periphery. [My] colleague . . . Dr. Paul Hiebert . . . .
springs from Mennonite stock and analyzes his heritage in a fashion
that he himself would acknowledge is something of a simplistic
caricature, but a useful one nonetheless.
One generation of Mennonites believed the gospel and held as well that there were certain social, economic, and political entailments.
The next generation assumed the gospel, but identified with the entailments.
The following generation denied the gospel: the “entailments” became everything.
Assuming this sort of scheme for evangelicalism, one suspects that
large swaths of the movement are lodged in the second step, with some
drifting toward the third. Keep Reading...
No comments:
Post a Comment