Every so often, the champions and foes of "Red Letter" Christianity
break out their arguments, sharpen them up, and take to the internet.
Champions say we've ignored the words of Jesus—highlighted in some
modern Bibles with red lettering—for far too long. They want us to take
up the radical call to discipleship Jesus issued in the Sermon on the
Mount. The foes say that even printing these words in red creates a
false, canon-within-a-canon that distorts the Scriptures.
Of course, there is a good sense in which we ought to give heightened priority to the words and deeds of Jesus. Unfortunately, some other
self-described, "Red Letter" Christians do more than them priority.
Instead, they contrast and even set in opposition the words of Jesus
from the writings of Paul, or some other similarly ill-tempered and
unprogressive disciple. While problematic, that approach is even less
concerning than the tendency to pit Jesus against the Bible he grew up with:
the Old Testament. Jesus' words and character are contrasted with the
Old Testament law, or the various commands of God scattered throughout
the narrative sections of the Torah. So where Jesus and the Old
Testament seem to conflict on violence, neighbor-love, sexuality, or
some other hot topic, go with Jesus, they say. If you have to pick
between red or black letters, go with red.
At the risk of kicking off another round of 'robust dialogue', here are three reasons why that approach doesn't really work. Continue at Derek Rishmawy
No comments:
Post a Comment