I was glad to see some some constructive dialogue in the comments section of Tullian Tchividjian's reply to my critique of his article on total depravity and Christians.
Let me say at this point (even though I look forward to the day when
such statements are not necessary) that: 1) I bear no ill will to
Tullian nor was I launching a personal attack against him; 2) I wrote an
article expressing concern about something he had written, not heresy
charges in a court of the church; and 3) it has been my impression that
the whole point of blogging is to stimulate useful thinking among
Christians. This is why I engaged in a public response to a public
article rather than private dialogue.
Being
something of an internet veteran, I was not surprised, however, to see
that it took only three comments to Tullian's reply for one of his
supporters to accuse me of sin. I hope in this response to allay such
concerns and hopefully to advance constructive dialogue further.
My aim in this reply will therefore be simply to clarify my
original concerns with Tullian's previous article. They are these:
1.
The doctrine of total depravity does not merely state that after the
Fall all men and women are effected by sin in the totality of their
beings. The doctrine also states that they have no disposition towards
God but only hostility and spiritual inability (see Berkhof, p. 247 for
this definition). I agree that Tullian specified the former and not the
latter of these two components. The problem is that the term "total
depravity" includes both. In his reply, Tullian gave numerous citations
from Reformed confessions regarding the on-going depravity of
Christians. I would not quarrel with any of them, but would only note
that none of these define Christians with the term "total depravity,"
nor with the definition of this specific doctrine. So, in this respect,
my critique of Tullian was saying, "Please don't use the term 'total
depravity' for regenerate Christians, even while seeking to qualify the
term, because it is not accurate." Continue at Rick Phillips
No comments:
Post a Comment