From time to time we hear some telling us that evangelical
Christianity must retool our sexual ethic if we're ever going to reach
the next generation. Some say that Millennials, particularly, are
leaving the church because of our "obsession" with sexual morality. The
next generation needs a more flexible ethic, they say, on premarital
sex, homosexuality, and so on. We'll either adapt, the line goes, or
we'll die.
This
argument is hardly new. In the early 20th century, this was precisely
the rhetoric used by liberal Protestant Harry Emerson Fosdick and his
co-laborers. Fosdick was concerned, he said, for the future of
Christianity, and if the church was to have a future we would have to
get over our obsession with virginity. By that, Fosdick didn't mean the
virginity of single Christians but the virginity of our Lord's mother.
The younger generation wanted to be Christian, the progressives told
their contemporaries, but they couldn't accept outmoded ideas of the
miraculous, such as the virgin birth of Christ. What the liberals missed
is that such miracles didn't become hard to believe with the onset of
the modern age. They always had been hard to believe from the beginning. Continue at Russell D. Moore
No comments:
Post a Comment