The student of the New Testament should be primarily an historian.
The center and core of all the Bible is history. Everything else that
the Bible contains is fitted into an historical framework and leads up
to an historical climax. The Bible is primarily a record of events.
That
assertion will not pass unchallenged. The modern Church is impatient
of history. History, we are told, is a dead thing. Let us forget the
Amalekites, and fight the enemies that are at our doors. The true
essence of the Bible is to be found in eternal ideas; history is merely
the form in which those ideas are expressed. It makes no difference
whether the history is real or fictitious; in either case, the ideas
are the same. It makes no difference whether Abraham was an historical
personage or a myth; in either case his life is an inspiring example of
faith. It makes no difference whether Moses was really a mediator
between God and Israel; in any case the record of Sinai embodies the
idea of a covenant between God and his people. It makes no difference
whether Jesus really lived and died and rose again as he is declared to
have done in the Gospels; in any case the Gospel picture, be it ideal
or be it history, is an encouragement to filial piety. In this way,
religion has been made independent, as is thought, of the uncertainties
of historical research. The separation of Christianity from history
has been a great concern of modern theology. It has been an insping
attempt. But it has been a failure.
Give up history, and you can
retain some things. You can retain a belief in God. But philosophical
theism has never been a powerful force in the world. You can retain a
lofty ethical ideal. But be perfectly clear about one point-you can
never retain a gospel. For gospel means "good news," tidings,
information about something that has happened. In other words, it
means history. A gospel independent of history is simply a
contradiction in terms. Continue at J. Gresham Machen
No comments:
Post a Comment