Dr. R. C. Sproul answers this question in an article entitled “A Rose is a Rose.” He writes:
A rose is a rose is a rose. This dictum reinforces the adage that a
rose by any other name is still a rose. The idea is that the essence of
the rose is not conditioned by what name is attached to it. It is its
res, not its nomina, that determines what it is. In different languages,
the same flower is known by different names, but it is still the same
flower.
When we apply this idea to theology things get a bit more
complicated. Indeed the rose adage has been transferred indiscriminately
to religion in order to create a theological concept. The concept is:
“God by any other name is still God.” Now certainly, it is true that the
immutable essence of God is not changed by the alteration of His name.
In English, we may say “God,” in German “Gott,” in Greek “Theos,” yet
all these names or words are used to point to the same Deity.
Beyond this, however, things get murky. It is a quantum leap to go
from saying that God by any other name is still God, to saying that all
the great religions in the world believe in the same Being though they
call Him different names.
This irrational leap is prodded by the popular analogy of the
mountain. This analogy notes that their are many roads up the mountain.
Some progress on a more direct route, while others wind about on more
circuitous roads, but sooner or later they all arrive at the same place,
at the top of the mountain. Continue at John Samson

No comments:
Post a Comment