On Sunday in the Aquila Report Bill Evans made some interesting
claims concerning Mormonism in his attempt to persuade readers that
there is a Christian position in the upcoming presidential election – a
position that requires voting for Mitt Romney.
While Mormons are not Christians in the traditional creedal sense of the term, I also have little doubt that there are Mormons who are looking in faith to Christ for salvation. In addition, the argument can be made that Mormons are closer to biblical truth on some issues than many liberal Protestants.
Scott Clark has a thoughtful analysis of Evans’s claim
at the Heidelblog so I won’t offer that here. What strikes me is how so
many Christian conservatives, from Bill Evans to Billy Graham, feel the
need to soften their criticism of Mormonism in order to justify voting
for Romney.
Part of what puts Evans, at least, in this position, may be his
off-handed dismissal of the two kingdoms perspective. Christians who do
not conflate the kingdom of God with the kingdoms of this world have
less trouble justifying voting for a candidate who approximates their
understanding of justice regardless of his or her religion. To be sure,
they do give up the right to claim their perspective on the election as
the Christian one, a concession Evans is loath to make.
For a much better perspective on the upcoming election – one grounded in the two kingdoms perspective – see Richard Phillips’s article published by the Aquila Report
yesterday. Phillips argues that the church should proclaim the
political principles taught in Scripture but should avoid entanglements
in politics itself. Why? Continue at Matthew Tuininga
No comments:
Post a Comment