Over the years, I have had many people tell me that they asked their
pastor or other Christian leaders whether they believed in six literal
days of creation. They would tell me the answer was often “yes” and
therefore these leaders (apparently) agreed with Answers in Genesis. But
sadly, these leaders may not agree with AiG’s stand on six literal
days, young earth, no death and disease before sin, etc. How is that
possible?
I have found that some people (like Hugh Ross, for instance) will say
they believe that God created in six days, but you have to ask very
specific questions and discover that they really mean millions of years!
Even though Hugh Ross uses the word “day,” his understanding of what
that means can be very different to what the person asking the question
understands it to be. Also, there are many Christian leaders who will
say they believe in six literal days of creation according to the
literature of Genesis, but they may believe in millions of years and
adopt a compromise position like the Gap Theory, Framework Hypothesis,
or views like that of John Sailhammer (the billions of years for the
universe supposedly fit in Genesis 1:1).
Here is a good case in point. Many people over the past couple of
years have told me how great it is that R.C. Sproul—a very fine Bible
teacher whose resources have been a blessing to many—changed his mind
about Genesis and would now agree with the stand AiG takes on the six
days of creation and the age of the earth and universe. However, having
read recent articles and heard R.C Sproul discuss this issue, I was
really skeptical that he would agree with the stand that AiG takes. Tim
Challies, a blogger, author, and reviewer recently published an
interview he had with R.C. Sproul. Here is the section pertaining to the
question about the days of creation and the age of the earth. Continue at AnswerInGenesis
No comments:
Post a Comment