It doesn’t really matter in the final analysis whether Luther and
Calvin would find the average evangelical church in America today more
or less congenial than Rome. Yet it does suggest an interesting point
of departure as we think about the reasons why some find the latter
attractive.
Many of us were raised to believe that we had all the answers
(whatever they were) and that Roman Catholicism believes in Mary and the
pope rather than Jesus and the Bible, in salvation by works rather than
grace. And yet, as the surveys demonstrate, we didn’t really know what
we believed or why we believed it—beyond a few slogans. If one asked
the question in the correct form, we could possibly give the right
answer on the big ones at least. However, a rising generation now is
indistinguishable in its beliefs from Mormons, Unitarians, or those who
check the “spiritual but not religious” box.
“Moralistic-Therapeutic-Deism” is the working theology of most
Americans, including evangelicals, we’re told. So when it comes to
authority and salvation—the two issues at the heart of the Reformation’s
concern, Protestantism today (mainline and evangelical) seems
increasingly remote from anything that the Reformers would have
recognized as catholic and evangelical faith and practice.
In my “cage phase” (when emerging Reformed zealots should be
quarantined for a while), I read from a sixteenth-century confession the
section on grace and justification. The audience was a rather large
group of fellow students at a Christian college. “Do you think we could
sign this statement today?”, I asked. Several replied, “No: it’s too
Calvinistic.” That was interesting, because I was quoting the Sixth
Session of the Council of Trent, which anathematized the Reformation’s
teaching that justification was by Christ’s merits alone, imputed to
sinners through faith alone. I didn’t quote the whole section, but only
the part that affirmed that we are saved by grace and that our
cooperation in the process of salvation—even our will to
believe—requires God’s grace.
You have to dig beneath the sweeping slogans and generalizations; its
precisely in the details—where many eyes glaze over—that the massive
differences between Rome and the Reformation appear. Continue at Michael Horton
No comments:
Post a Comment