Should the Church Promote Contraceptives for the Unmarried?

One of the significant debates at the General Assembly was the debate about whether or not to stay in the National Association of Evangelicals. The answer was that we will stay in but keep an eye on the NAE. For the record, I thought this was a good decision. You can read a full report of what happened on Wednesday, June 20th on this action here. On Thursday, news came out at Worldmag.com that the NAE accepted $1 million to promote contraceptives among the unmarried. The story states in part:

The $1 million (apparently for use over several years) was not much by Hewlett or National Campaign standards, but it’s big for the NAE, which had a total budget of about $1 million in 2009, 2010, and 2011, according to the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability. And what exactly is “the work” that will continue if the NAE gets another grant?

Here’s an example: The NAE sponsored a panel in April at the Q Gathering in Washington, D.C., where young evangelicals gathered to hear speakers and panels address numerous topics, including abortion reduction. According to Q founder Gabe Lyons, the NAE “highly recommended” for inclusion in the panel the speaker who ended up dominating it, National Campaign CEO Sarah Brown—without disclosing its financial connection to her.

Brown urged contraceptives for the unmarried as well as the married. No one on the panel disagreed. When it concluded, 372 audience members had the opportunity to answer electronically this question, “Do you believe churches should advocate contraception for their single 20-somethings?” Almost two-thirds voted yes.  Continue at Wes White