I appreciate the responses to my previous posts on this issue and,
after reading some of the questions, thought somewhat pressed to write
this last one. OK, so we know what Christian marriage is. We preach
that, teach it, and expect believers to embrace Scripture’s instructions
regarding sexual conduct, although we are still sinners who must
continually repent, trust in Christ, and receive his pardon. Got it.
But what about the public argument?
As I said in the last one, we aren’t authorized to speak in God’s
name where he hasn’t spoken, but we are commanded to do so wherever he
has. This is where it gets dicier, though. I’d like to frame my
response, first off, in terms of two extremes that we have to avoid:
1. Treating references to homosexuality in the Old
Testament as either irrelevant or directly applicable to the current
question.
You see this in public debates of the issue, where extremists on both sides talk over (and past) each other. One thing they often share in common is interest in quoting passages from the Old Testament on the question. Then the person on the left reminds us that the sanction mentioned is stoning. “Do you want to stone gays?”, one shouts. “No, but I believe what the Bible says about homosexuality.” “Well, right next to that verse it says that you should stone disobedient children—Oh, and not eat pork, and not touch a woman who is having her period.” Bottom line: the skills of biblical interpretation are about equally as bad on both sides of the table.
The statements in Leviticus are part of the Mosaic covenant. They
pertain uniquely to the covenant that God made with Israel as a nation.
The laws that governed every aspect of private and public life, cult
and culture, were a unique episode in redemptive history. Their divine
purpose cannot be rationalized in terms of sanitation, public health, or
personal well-being. The whole focus was on God and his desire to
separate Israel from the nations, preparing the way for the Messiah to
come from her womb. Therefore, there is no more biblical warrant for
stoning homosexuals today than there is for avoiding Scottish cuisine. Continue at Michael Horton
No comments:
Post a Comment