As a minister of the Word, I am not only authorized but commanded to
speak in God’s name where he has clearly spoken. The authority of the
church’s speech is undermined either by saying too little or by saying
too much. Ironically, when we respect the limits that God has placed on
our public speech in God’s name, we dig more deeply into our own
scriptures and are better enabled to exhibit a different pattern of
living that, for all of its inconsistencies and hypocrisy, points not
just to a better argument that still trades on the assumptions of this
fading age, but points to the new creation.
With that in mind, I’m following up my previous post (“Same-Sex Marriage Makes Sense”)
with a few thoughts about how we as Christians should ground our
corporate beliefs about marriage as a witness to the powers, rulers, and
authorities of this age without becoming their servant.
In my last post I suggested that same-sex marriage makes sense within
the moral framework of a universe in which I am the center, my
individual choice is absolute even over nature and nature’s God, and
whatever role God might have is defined by my story, not his. In that
light, the same-sex marriage debate is just the tip of the iceberg. Our
own traditional marriages-indeed, Christian ones-fall short of the
glory of God. The issues cut deeper than the assault on marriage or
crumbling marriages or even pornography and other perversions of God’s
order. Yet even to fall short of something is to have something to fall
short of. And if there are no longer any sins to confess, then there
isn’t any guilt to be forgiven by a gracious and loving God “who is just
and the justifier of the one who has faith in Christ” (Rom 3:26).
What Really Matters? How Our Lives Reflect our Worldview
As I argue at length in The Christian Faith, our lives are
shaped by the intersection of the specific drama, doctrine, doxology,
and discipleship that unfolds in Scripture. First, the drama. We go
back to this basic story to make sense of the events that otherwise
would seem atomistic and meaningless. Second, this plot becomes
meaningful to us through the doctrines and commands. So how should I
respond to this story? The drama has to mean something first, before it
“means something to me,” but the latter is the special concern of
doctrine. Israel knows that God is faithful because he has proved it in
the historical drama. The gospel story is that Jesus was crucified,
buried, and raised, but a remote history becomes our story when we hear
that “he was crucified for our sins and was raised for our justification” (Rom 4:25).
If the doctrines arising from this drama lead us to faith in Christ,
then the commands elicit our obedience. The doctrines and commands
connect us here and now to the story then and there. Faith breaks out
in thanksgiving and praise. Twice, right after teaching God’s
unconditional grace in election and redemption (in Romans 8 and 11),
Paul is led to outbursts: “What shall we say in response to these
things? If God is for us, who can be against us?”; “For from him and to
him and through him are all things, to whom be the glory forever.
Amen.” In this mode of praise and thanksgiving, faith bears the fruit
of good works: “I urge you, therefore, in view of God’s mercies, to
present your bodies as a living sacrifice…” (Rom 12:1). Continue at Michael Horton
No comments:
Post a Comment