Initially I can appreciate why forgiving yourself might seem like a good
idea. For instance, if I was driving drunk and accidentally killed
another person, I think I would find the guilt unbearable. . . . I can
see why it might seem necessary for me to forgive myself before I could move on with my life.
But this is why I can’t go there. Forgiveness requires both a victim and an offender, and so to forgive myself
means that I am playing both roles. And so a part of me is allowed—even
required—to play the victim for something that I did. But I shouldn’t
get to play the victim, for I am the offender in this case. If I forgive myself, then I am asserting that I, like the person I killed, am a victim of my sin.
So rather than say that I must forgive myself,
I think I should say that I must receive God’s forgiveness. His
forgiveness matters more than mine anyway, and receiving his forgiveness
reminds me that my proper and only place in this matter is the
offender.
If you think my position is too harsh, imagine that someone
has deeply wounded you. When they come to ask for forgiveness and
reconciliation, what would you think if they said, “I need you to forgive me, and then I need to forgive myself.”
Wouldn’t you be insulted? Wouldn’t you reply that after what they did,
they don’t get to play the victim? That they are in no way the innocent
party here? Keep Reading >>>
No comments:
Post a Comment